Letter: E Manser to M Spriggs

This letter was written by Elizabeth Sarah Manser (1835-1904) to her mother-in-law to be Martha Spriggs née Knight (1777-1866) on the occasion of her engagement to William Spriggs (1821-1899). The letter is a response to Martha’s letter to Elizabeth. I must conclude the date of the letter ought to be 1865, as Martha died 31 Jan 1866 (per Quaker Annual Monitor). See original. Elizabeth lived in Hoddeston (now North London), Martha in Worcester, England.

Hoddeston
November 3rd, 1866

My dear Mother,

I thank thou very sincerely for thy welcome and hand note. It is so pleasant to me. I know that thou likes our engagement and I earnestly desire to have them and thy Sister’s love. I feel that I love you now and doubt not shall do so much more when I know you all intimately. I hope one day thou will comet know us at home. We shall do all in our power to make thee comfortable and I am sure thou will be able to be quite at home, and a change of view  and quiet visit will I hope do thee good after such long anxiety. Mother [sends] her dear love and is much obliged for thy message and will be glad to welcome thee here.

It seems a strange and new position to me to be placed in and at present I can scarcely realize it, but sincerely hope and trust I shall be enabled to make William happy, unworthy as I feel of his deep and devoted affections. I know he has had a very happy home and I feel for thee in losing his companionship but I trust in his case it will be once received into his family ______. I feel sure it will be so and with very much love I remain

Thy truly affectionate,

Elizabeth Sarah Manser

Haddon Fishers

Apr 30 2019

Hi Peter,

Don’t give up on your Haddon Hall Fishers.  Check out Kinsalebeg.com and you’ll find lots of Fishers which may well give you a path to the pot of gold.
Another interesting trail to follow is a note that our Grandfather mentioned in his genealogy.  It is the match between Reuben Fisher and Mary O’Callaghan.  Follow Mary’s lineage which will take to an amazing path to the past.  Check out my tree to see if your findings confirm mine.
Good hunting.
John
St Bartholomew’s Church, Extract

St Bartholomew’s Church, Extract

The inquisition for the feudal aid levied by Edward III in 1346 found a Radulphus de Lingayn holding the manors of Aymestrey and Lower Lye,[17] close to both Lingen and Wigmore in Herefordshire: both estates belonged to the honour of Radnor and were within the large tracts of the Welsh Marches dominated by the Mortimer family of Wigmore Castle. Isabel had Tong and a large portfolio of Trussell estates settled on her for life, which was to lead to prolonged and bitter conflict between the Trussell family and Sir Fulk’s heir, Richard Vernon of Haddon Hall.[18]

The king’s licence gave permission for Isabel, Walter Swan and William Mosse to grant the advowson of the college, once it was securely founded, to Richard Vernon – called in this instance Richard de Penbrugge,[29] presumably to emphasise his kinship to Sir Fulk. In fact he was the grandson of Sir Fulk’s sister, Juliana.[30] Named alongside him was Benedicta de Ludlow, his wife, who was the daughter of Isabel of Lingen. The advowson was to pass to their heirs or, if the Vernon line failed, to a branch of the Ludlow family. However, the Vernons were to hold the advowson, along with Tong manor and castle until well into the next century. They were in this period the wealthiest of the Derbyshire gentry families, closer in income and lifestyle to the nobility than to the rest of the gentry. By the end of the century their estates across eight counties were bringing in well over £600 per year.[31]

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Bartholomew%27s_Church,_Tong#Tombs

Haddon Hall Connection

Haddon Hall

Peter is asked to explain the connection to Haddon Hall   
Have a seat. This is complicated and my tree is a mess of contradictions here which I need to clear up. However, here is how I think it goes….
You and I share great grandparents — William Hayward and Elizabeth (nee) Alexander. Elizabeth’s father was Samuel Alexander (1818-1907). Samuel married Isabella Fisher (1821-1901). The Fishers and the Alexanders seemed to hit it off for Samuel Alexander’s father also married a Fisher. But that’s another story.
We’re interested in the Fisher line here because they lead us to Haddon Hall. Isabella Fisher’s father was Benjamin Fisher (1781-1863). He married Mary Unthank (1783-1855). Now here is an interesting kink: Mary Unthank’s mother was Deborah Richardson (1756-1848). Deborah is our fourth great grandmother and is no doubt related to your father’s Richardsons.

Anyway, we back up to Benjamin Fisher (Deborah’s son), then follow the Fishers back to 1500 when William Fisher (1479-1519) married Mary Vernon (1488-1536). And that’s the connection to Haddon Hall which was owned by the Vernons. William and Mary were our 13th great grand-parents.

As an aside, their son Thomas Fisher (1510-1556) married Elizabeth Brocket (1522-?). The Brockets were a wealthy and influential family in the day and entertained blue bloods including the Queen routinely and the hall was infamous for its racy affairs (Google ‘Brocket Hall. It’s a bed and breakfast for the rich. You’re welcome to spend the night if you don’t mind dropping a grand).
Well, there you have it. A snippet anyway. There are stories galore tucked away in this tree (in every tree!).
Love, Peter
May 14, 2019

 

 

Hi again Peter,

Thanks for the note.
Regarding the Richardson connection.  It is reasonably common name and they could well be connected.  My problem is how does one get from Deborah’s Grandfather, William Richardson, who married Sarah Weston in Limerick in 1719 to the large clan of Richardson’s in the Newcastle area?
Regarding Benjamin Clarke Fisher, I have traced him back to Reuben Fisher,  of Southwark and his wife Joan Howe in the mid 1600s and no further.  The Kinsalebeg history(Google) mentions that the London area Fisher’s extended family included Sir Edward Of Mickleton & London, Sir Thomas of Islington and Sir Clement MP(1661-1669) and a 2nd Baronet.  Clement married (1662) royalist heroine Jane Lane who helped Charles II escape to France.
 Now the connection to Haddon Hall?
All grist for the Ancestry mill.
Regards to all and especially Lucy and James.  Hope you are all well
John

 

 

Hey John,

Re. “how does one get from Deborah’s Grandfather, William Richardson, who married Sarah Weston in Limerick in 1719 to the large clan of Richardson’s in the Newcastle area?” Well I expect they took a boat. Horse-drawn coach across the breadth of England would not be for the faint of heart. Just kidding. I have no idea, I just put it out there as a possibility. As for the Fishers, I go as follows:
Reuben F — Joan Howe
Thomas F (1617) — Mary Price (1621)
Sir Edward Fisher (1587-1654) — Lady Mary Maria Challoner (1590-1642)
Edward Fisher (1562-1628) — Avice Thornhill (1560-1604)
Thomas Richard Fisher (1533-1584) — Anne Brand 1537-)
Thomas Fisher (1510-1556) — Elizabeth Brocket (1522-)
William Fisher (1479-1519) — Mary Vernon (1488-1536) Married 1500
Randall Fisher (1455-) — Elizabeth (here the Fisher trail stops)
Mary Vernon was a co-heiress of Haddon Hall along with her sisters Anne and Dorothy. Dorothy Vernon was the subject of romantic legend (google Dorothy Vernon Haddon Hall). She eloped with a handsome John Manners after her father refused to allow the marriage. Why is unclear. John’s prospects were reasonable. His family had their own castle up the road. His descendent, the current Earl of Rutland, still owns Haddon Hall and his brother lives there. While at Haddon, my concerted attempts to “knock him up” came to naught. Thought we might have a little cousin to cousin chit-chat, but no. Probably busy in the village collecting rents from destitute widows. Or perhaps he was down at the Purple Pear quaffing a pint while the Ferrari got an oil change. In any case, the poor chap missed the chance to make the Canadian Connection. He’ll never know how close he came. Probably best.
Sir Edward Fisher of Mickleton is our man (9th great grandfather). Can’t find the others. Sir Edward and Avice Thornhill had a daughter Francesse. Francesse married Rev Thomas Rose (1619-1692). The Roses, Fishers and Thornhills all lived in Mickleton, a tiny village on the north edge of the Cotswolds and importantly, within striking distance of London. Thomas and Francesse had 11 children, nine of them boys. Oh my. Four of the boys as adults went into business together, capitalizing on their respective skills. Fulke Rose was a medical doctor, John was a merchant sea captain, William was an apothecary and astute money manager, and one or two of the other brothers pitched in where needed.  What played out was a lucrative arrangement. In the 1670s Fulke ran a very profitable medical practice in Jamaica catering to wealthy plantation owners. He also bought a plantation and called on two of his brothers to help manage it. Captain John Rose transported criminals and political prisoners to Jamaica to work off their ten year sentences on the plantations, notably his brother’s. And of course, John got paid for his efforts by the British government. Fulke and Co. got free labour and on the return trip to England, John filled the holds of his two ships with Rose sugar. William managed the proceeds. All in all, it was a shrewd variation of the triangular slave trade.
William has his own claim to fame. Apothecaries in those days routinely treated the ill and injured who lacked the funds to visit a surgeon. He was unable, however, to cure one of his patients of what was likely a sexually transmitted disease. He billed the man steeply for his efforts and the man complained to the College of Surgeons. They took William to court on the grounds that apothecaries were not licensed to practice as medical doctors. He lost but won on appeal, arguing that the poor had no option but to seek the help of apothecaries, as they could not afford a doctor’s fee. Apothecaries, therefore, were carrying out a service essential to the well-being of the community. Apothecaries, as a result of that court case, became the general practitioners of today. The William Rose Prize is given annually to a student who contributes significantly to the history of medicine. William is our 1st cousin 9x removed.
Very interesting to hear about Sir Clement, Jane Lane and the connection to Charles II. I’ll explore that. Thanks for the info John. What fun this is. Hope I didn’t beat you to death with all this. Big hugs, Peter

Haddon Visit

Sep 12, 2018

Toured Haddon Hall yesterday. Absolutely amazing. Haddon is a large medieval manor house which dates back to the 1100s and which came into the hands of our 26th great grandfather Sir Richard de Vernon with his marriage to Avice Avenell in 1170. Haddon is considered to be the most authentic medieval manor anywhere. Pix attached. Love, Peter and Randi

 

Haddon Hall, Peak District England

No Go At Ludlow

Ludlow Castle, Shropshire

Ludlow Castle An hour’s drive to the southwest of St Bartholomew’s Church near the border with Wales is Ludlow Castle. It peaked my interest because Benedicta de Ludlow (1392-1451) is my 16th great grandmother and I assumed there was a connection between her family and the Castle. I know the Ludlows didn’t build it, the Norman castle builder Walter de Lacey did around 1075. Ludlow was the administrative centre for the region and one of a string of castles built along the welsh border to counter incursions by the indomidable Welsh. The name Ludlow was attached to the castle before 1138. It derives from Old English and means ‘a place on a hill (low) by loud (lud) waters.’ Thus, it seems, ‘de Ludlow’ is a reference to the place where Benedicta’s family lived, which may or may not have been the castle.

No matter. It turns out that a generation or so later, in 1501,  another rellie did move into Ludlow castle with his new bride — 16 year old Arthur Tudor, Prince of Wales, Earl of Chester and Duke of Cornwall (to rest the mind, allow me to point out that all four of those gentlemen were Arthur), eldest son of King Henry VII and heir apparent. His bride was Catherine of Aragon, a Spanish princess. It was a marriage arranged by King Henry and the King of Spain to cement the alliance between their nations. These two were the power couple of the day.

Those were tumultuous years. England had been devastated economically and socially by the Hundred Years War (1337-1453). A mere two years after that war ended, civil war broke out in England between the House of Lancaster and the House of York, rival factions of the long-ruling House of Plantagenet. That messy business, called the Wars of the Roses (Lancastrians were associated with the red rose, Yorkists with the white rose) carried on for 32 years, ending in 1487.  Enter King Henry VII, a Lancastrian (they got the last whack) who came up with the brilliant idea to marry Elizabeth of York, effectively joining the two houses and securing domestic peace.

Then Henry upped the ante and arranged for his eldest son Arthur to marry Catherine of Aragon and secure an Anglo-Spanish alliance against France. Things were looking up. With Spain and Britain on the same side, the risk of French aggression would be considerably reduced. Peace meant Henry might even be able to stash a few gold ducets for a rainy day. Hopefully he did, for it wasn’t long before it rained.

Arthur and Catherine set up housekeeping in Ludlow Castle but six months later Arthur died. The cause of death was either not known or not revealed. Either way, Arthur, a healthy, strapping young man was suddenly dead. That put Henry in a bit of a pickle with the King of Spain who was counting on the alliance. Understandably, Britain and the rest of Europe were, by that time, sick to death (pardon the phrase) of blood, guts and rolling heads.

Peace was in the air but marriages were needed to to serve as glue. Henry, resourceful soul that he was, quickly realized he had a groom in reserve — his other son Henry. King Henry made the necessary arrangements for Catherine to switch horses. Her marriage to Arthur was annulled on the basis of failure to consummate. Catherine swore up and down (pardon the phrase) that in the six months she lived with handsome, tall, affable, well-built Arthur, they never had sex. It seemed reasonable. Every one of Henry’s courtiers nodded and agreed, as did the King of Spain. And Catherine lived to see another day, which, as it would later turn out, was more than two other wives of Henry VIII got to do. What she couldn’t have known is that in front of her lay a lifetime of uphill sledding with an obese, brute of a man whom, shall we say, lacked the graces of a Spanish monarch but possessed the cunning of a jackal.

The cause of young Arthur’s death was never uncovered. However, I have my suspicions.

Arthur Tudor, Prince of Wales (1486-1502)

Relation to Arthur: 2nd cousin 15x removed

Catherine of Aragon (1485-1536)

Relation: wife of 2nd cousin 15x removed

King Henry VIII (1486-1502)

Relation: stepson of 1st cousin 16x removed

Leather

Our tour bus wound down and down off the heights of the North York Moors as we edged our way towards Whitby on Yorkshire’s east coast. There are no shoulders on these roads and no second chances. If you want to be home for dinner, you had best pay attention. As we neared Whitby, we passed through the little village of Great Ayton. It was here in the early 1700s that Captain James Cook (1728-1779) spent the latter years of his childhood.

History of Tanning

The word ‘tanning’ today conjures up images of lying on a tropical white sand beach or less appealing to me, in a proprietor’s well-lit coffin-like box in the midst of a Canadian winter. However, in the 1800s and for a few years before that, tanning meant something entirely different. Tanning was and still is the process by which animal hides are protected from decay and rendered supple for various uses. We call the result of tanning, leather.

Between two million and 100,000 years ago hominids became systematic and successful hunters. As well as hunting tools, they developed tools for fleshing hides. During Ice Ages, they utilized hides for shelters, likely building fires within. Experts surmise that smoke from the fires, over time, tanned the hides, making them reusable over a lengthy period and resulting in the intentional use of smoke-tanning to provide a crude form of leather. Opening day at the Stockton & Darlington Railway, Yorkshire One hundred thousand years ago during the last Great Ice Age, Neanderthal man inhabited Europe. They used advanced hunting and hide processing methods which allowed them to survive and thrive, even in northern tundra. That suggests that they had perfected the making of warm clothing and footwear, that is, that they had knowledge of tanning and possessed skills in making leather products. The weakened small toe bones of 40,000 year old human fossils found in a Missouri cave suggest that sandals were being worn then. Coloured leather, sandals, bags, cushions and leather clothing, dated between 5000 BCE and 2000 BCE have been found in Nubian tombs.

William Richardson (1660-1740)

I could go on but here it is in a nutshell: tanning and leather have been around for a very long time. And most of us will agree that despite the advent of synthetics, there is still nothing like a finely made leather purse or shoe. Up until the late 1800s, leather was widely used for footwear, clothing, harnesses, carriage suspensions, book binding, vellum, fastenings and in large quantities for fitting out sailing ships and factories. There was simply nothing to replace the superior qualities of leather. It is strong, flexible, hard-wearing and waterproof. When Cook’s family arrived in Great Ayton, the Richardsons had been farming the area for one hundred years. They were well landed and well off. Young James Cook left Great Ayton for the history books, but the Richardsons remained. In the late 1600s, William Richardson (1660-1740) made a fateful decision. He decided to supplement his farming income by tanning leather. The new endeavour went so well that it was not long before tanning replaced farming altogether and all three of William’s sons had become tanners. The Richardson Tanneries For the next 300 years, the Richardson name became synonymous with tanning. Generations of sons grew the tanning business at several Yorkshire locations, the largest and most successful of which was at Newcastle-On-Tyne, the famous Edward & James Richardson (est. 1863). By 1913 their factory was enormous. Over the ensuing decades, E&J Richardson produced not only a wide range of tanned leather but almost every conceivable leather product as well. How It’s Done For the curious, here’s how tanning was traditionally done (trap yourself a rat in the backyard and follow along).

The Tanning Process

There were nine stages which could take up to a year to complete: 1. Plug your nose with wads of cotton soaked in Vicks Vapo-Rub (my idea) 2. Preserve the skin with salt 3. Wash the skin to remove the salt 4. Treat the hide with urine or lime 5. Scrape off the flesh, fat and hairs with the hide over a beam 6. Treat the hide with dog or pigeon faeces or animal brains 7. Soak the hide in progressively stronger solutions of tannic acid to prevent decomposition 8. Dry, then treat with wax or oil 9. Find another way to make a living Great Ayton was the perfect place to build tanneries because it had an over-abundance of dog faeces, pigeon droppings, urine and lime — all the essentials for tanning. Tourism, for some reason, never thrived in Great Ayton.

Life Goes On

In the 1970s, Edward and James Richardson could no longer compete profitably in the global marketplace and closed their doors. The Richardsons moved on to other things. Today, Hugh and Tom Richardson of Northumberland, have a thriving ice cream business. From the hides of dead cows to the cream of live cows, life goes on.

 

E&J Richardson Factory, Newcastle-On-Tyne 

Ships

John Wigham Richardson (1837-1908) was born in Newcastle-On-Tyne to Quakers Edward Richardson and Jane Wigham. He attended Bootham School in York, famous for its high quality education based on Quaker values. John’s nephew, Charles Merz, pioneered electricity distribution, inventing the concept of synchronized grids now used world-wide.

The family business was leather tanning, however John’s interest was shipbuilding. He apprenticed first as a draftsman, then in steam tug construction. In 1860, at age 23, John started his own shipyard, Neptune Works (known widely as Wigham Richardson), with a loan from his father. His was one of the first shipyards to build steel ships. As a pacifist Quaker, John did not build vessels for the British Navy.

In true Quaker fashion, the shipyard’s steam engine also powered the neighbourhood’s electric lights. As well, John’s concern for his worker’s well-being led him to found the Worker’s Benevolent Trust, a precursor to trade unions. In his latter years, John left the Quaker faith and became an Anglican, probably because of pressure from his business partner, Swan Hunter, to bid on lucrative Admiralty contracts.

The first ship built was the 65 foot paddle steamer Victoria, used as a ferry carrying passengers, carts and livestock. As years past, Wigham Richardson’s shipbuilding experience grew with the size and complexity of the ships they built. At the same time, they built marine engines which they used in the ships they constructed and which they sold to other yards on the Tyne and across Europe.

Wigham Richardson went on to build all manner of ships. In 1888, after 28 years in business, they built a four-masted, twin-funnelled ship, 408 feet long, with accommodations for 1040 passengers. From 1895 to 1901 the yard was expanded to 18 acres, allowing the construction of 12 freighters.

 

The company’s timing was exquisite. They got in on the ground floor of steam-driven steel ship building at a time when there was a high demand for efficient marine travel for both cargo and passengers on coastal and trans-oceanic routes. As well, it was a time of mass migration and a desire by the wealthy to travel in style. Large ocean-going vessels with unimaginable amenities became both essential and avant garde. By the early 1900s, however, Wigham Richardson found itself unable to advance to the high-in-demand, lucrative liner contracts. It had the expertise, yet It simply could not raise the required capital alone.

The issue was resolved in 1903 when Wigham Richardson merged with Britain’s other large shipbuilder, Swan and Hunter. The merger was specifically designed to allow the companies to jointly bid on the contract to build the super liner Mauretania for the Cunard Line. Their bid was successful and the new company Swan Hunter Wigham Richardson went on to build many more ships. Between 1906 and 1912 Swan Hunter Wigham Richardson was in its prime, producing the largest tonnage of ships in the world. In 1907, the company’s output in tonnage accounted for 15% of the world’s shipping.

The Mauretania made its maiden voyage in 1907. It held the Atlantic Blue Riband speed record until 1929. During World War I Mauretania was used as a transport and hospital ship. Over her lifetime, she made 269 double crossings of the Atlantic in addition to her work in the war. She was much loved by her loyal patrons. Even today, she is the largest ship ever built on the Tyne.

On July 4, 1935, at 6:30am, she arrived in a half-gale at Rosyth, Scotland to be scrapped. A lone piper stood on the quayside playing a funeral lament. When her great engines were shut down, Mauretania gave a final deep shudder and fell silent. Twenty-eight years of hard service came to a close. The following Sunday, Mauretania was opened to the public for one last time. Twenty thousand people showed up.

John Wigham Richardson (1837-1908)

Relation: 1st cousin 1x removed of husband of greataunt