Hong Kong

Chan, Ko, Kwan, Lai

The Opium Trade

China Controls Trade

British traders  during the late 18th century and early 19th century made fortunes introducing Chinese luxury goods to the wealthy of Britain. Porcelain, silk, fine furniture and tea were in huge demand in Britain, earning the adventurous immense profits.

There was, however, a catch. China had long been distrustful of foreigners . To control their influence, the Chinese government limited foreign trade to specified ports in South China, in large measure, Canton. Further, Chinese goods had to be be purchased with silver and trading for foreign goods was prohibited.

The arrangement worked well until the drain on British silver reserves and thus a trade imbalance in favour of the Chinese, became unsustainable for the British government. Westminster knew that something had to be done to balance trade, but what?

The government of the day was flummoxed. The Chinese had never expressed any interest in western made goods. They had no use for them, preferring instead, goods made by their time-honoured methods.

A Diabolical Scheme

The name of the person who came up with the idea to right the trade imbalance is lost to history, but the material, social, economic and political devastation to China which resulted from the idea will remain etched into the hearts and minds of the Chinese for all time.

The idea was to grow, transport and sell opium to the Chinese under the radar of the Chinese government, over time, generate a large population of opium addicts and require payment for the opium in silver. The silver could then be used to purchase luxury goods for sale in Britain.

All of that came true in epic proportions. The region we now know as the nation of Afghanistan was within the British Raj (British-controlled India). Conditions for growing opium there were perfect. The era of opium production and smuggling on an industrial scale began. As traders, notably the ‘Honourable’ East India Company, shipped massive amounts of Opium to China, addiction became widespread and ultimately, opium brought the Chinese Empire to its knees. Opium addiction was rampant at every level of Chinese society, including the military and even the Emperor’s royal court.

The Opium Wars

First Opium War
By 1839, the economic and social devastation caused by the illegal smuggling of opium into China by British, French and American traders had become intolerable to the Qing Dynasty. Without warning, the Chinese military appeared at the foreign factories in Canton and removed all the opium, threatening death for future offenders.

The British, by far the major source of opium, demanded compensation and the right to trade freely. China rejected the claim, arguing that the British actions were illegal and thus, the opium was subject to confiscation by law — an entirely supportable position under international law, both then and now. Yet Britain ignored its own fundamental principle of Rule By Law, for it did not serve its interests. Instead, it opted for ‘gunboat diplomacy.’ For three years, from 1839 to 1842,  Chinese and British militaries clashed.

However, China’s old world military technology could not compete. China signed the Treaty of Nanjing on the 29th of August, 1842. It was the first of the so-called unequal treaties between China and imperialist powers. In it, China was required to compensate British traders for their losses, compensate Britain for the costs of the war, agree to impose a “fair and reasonable” tariff and extend trading ports for British merchants from one (Guangzhou/Canton) to  five, along with the right to trade freely with any party.

 

Second Opium War

After the Treaty of Nanjing, the opium trade flourished.

Third Opium War

From 1910 until the devastating earthquake of 1923, the Bruce family maintained two households, one in Yokohama, Japan where Sydney Bruce worked as an accountant and one in South London, England where the children took their schooling. For most of their childhood the five children had only infrequent visits with their father and even their mother, as they generally boarded out.

 

The Canton Trade System

From 1910 until the devastating earthquake of 1923, the Bruce family maintained two households, one in Yokohama, Japan where Sydney Bruce worked as an accountant and one in South London, England where the children took their schooling. For most of their childhood the five children had only infrequent visits with their father and even their mother, as they generally boarded out.

 

Canton Trade System I
Canton Trade System II
Canton Trade System III

Hong Kong: A Spoil of War

From 1910 until the devastating earthquake of 1923, the Bruce family maintained two households, one in Yokohama, Japan where Sydney Bruce worked as an accountant and one in South London, England where the children took their schooling. For most of their childhood the five children had only infrequent visits with their father and even their mother, as they generally boarded out.

Scenes of Early Hong Kong

From 1910 until the devastating earthquake of 1923, the Bruce family maintained two households, one in Yokohama, Japan where Sydney Bruce worked as an accountant and one in South London, England where the children took their schooling. For most of their childhood the five children had only infrequent visits with their father and even their mother, as they generally boarded out.

Accounts of Early Hong Kong

From 1910 until the devastating earthquake of 1923, the Bruce family maintained two households, one in Yokohama, Japan where Sydney Bruce worked as an accountant and one in South London, England where the children took their schooling. For most of their childhood the five children had only infrequent visits with their father and even their mother, as they generally boarded out.

Daniel RF Caldwell

From 1910 until the devastating earthquake of 1923, the Bruce family maintained two households, one in Yokohama, Japan where Sydney Bruce worked as an accountant and one in South London, England where the children took their schooling. For most of their childhood the five children had only infrequent visits with their father and even their mother, as they generally boarded out.

Piracy, Daniel & the British Navy

From 1910 until the devastating earthquake of 1923, the Bruce family maintained two households, one in Yokohama, Japan where Sydney Bruce worked as an accountant and one in South London, England where the children took their schooling. For most of their childhood the five children had only infrequent visits with their father and even their mother, as they generally boarded out.

Daniel RF’s Family

From 1910 until the devastating earthquake of 1923, the Bruce family maintained two households, one in Yokohama, Japan where Sydney Bruce worked as an accountant and one in South London, England where the children took their schooling. For most of their childhood the five children had only infrequent visits with their father and even their mother, as they generally boarded out.

 

The Chinese Connection: Our Adopted Family

Daniel Edmund Caldwell

From 1910 until the devastating earthquake of 1923, the Bruce family maintained two households, one in Yokohama, Japan where Sydney Bruce worked as an accountant and one in South London, England where the children took their schooling. For most of their childhood the five children had only infrequent visits with their father and even their mother, as they generally boarded out.

Family Life
Letters 
Transcripts of Letters

18 Aug 1887
Danniel E to Rosie

21 Nov 1888
Daniel E to Rosie

18 Jul 1889
Daniel E to Rosie

20 Nov 1889
Daniel E to children

Explosion On The Yotsai
Disappeared

By the late 1880s Daniel seemed to be really struggling with his law practice, not from a lack of work for he must have had all the clients he could handle. Indeed, Daniel’s decision to take on a partner suggests he was becoming overwhelmed with the work. Worse, his letters to his family suggest he hated his job with its never-ending shuffling of paper and long waits in court.

Reading between the lines of his letters suggests two more things about Daniel: 1. he was under financial pressure with the expense of keeping up two households — one in Hong kong, the other in England. To lessen the burden, he moved to a a smaller house in Hong Kong  2. I believe Daniel was lonely. The only letters we have from Daniel are those he wrote to his children. They are filled with affection and genuine caring for the children and leave us with the unmistakable impression that he misses them terribly. What we do not know is the nature of Daniel’s relationship with his wife, Mary. We have no letters from her nor any to her. Could it be that the extensive time and distance between them led to a parting of the ways?

The bottom line for me is that Daniel was very probably lonely, perhaps desperately lonely. Perhaps as well, he found himself boxed into a life he deplored. His children were young and required support and a good education. And to leave Hong Kong and start all over again building a practice in London was financially impossible and emotionally un-do-able. If his debts worsened to the point of insolvency, he faced debtor’s prison, shame and a loss of professional credibility from which he would never recover. Unlike his father, who handily survived debtor’s prison because he was so essential to the running of the colony, Daniel Edmund was replaceable. 

On May 30, 1891, Daniel was due in court on a routine matter. He never showed. In fact, he was never seen again, not in Hong Kong or anywhere else. Daniel simply disappeared. Regrettably, the trust funds for the law practice disappeared with him. Did Daniel borrow money from the wrong people? Did he start a new life in the bowels of China? Did he make his way to Britain and live in the shadows near his family. Did my great grandfather, Daniel Edmund Caldwell, commit suicide?

 Wilkinson & Grist

Rose Mary Caldwell (See also The Bruces)

From 1910 until the devastating earthquake of 1923, the Bruce family maintained two households, one in Yokohama, Japan where Sydney Bruce worked as an accountant and one in South London, England where the children took their schooling. For most of their childhood the five children had only infrequent visits with their father and even their mother, as they generally boarded out.

Francis Williams Mitchell, PMG, JP

Documents
Images

Henry Charles Caldwell